Assessing the Frequency and Effectiveness of Various Arthroscopic Treatments in the Management of Symptomatic Isolated Medial Meniscus Injuries Including Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.

The use of various strategies for arthroscopic meniscal repairs to save the meniscus and prevent the progression of knee osteoarthritis has gradually increased. We investigated the frequency of various arthroscopic treatments and the short-term clinical outcomes of symptomatic isolated medial meniscus (MM) injuries. This retrospective observational study included 193 patients (197 knees) who underwent arthroscopic meniscal treatment for isolated MM injuries between January 2016 and April 2019. Arthroscopic meniscal repairs were divided into two groups: transtibial pullout repairs of MM posterior root tears (MMPRTs) and arthroscopic meniscal repairs for other types of MM injuries. MMPRT pullout repair, other meniscal repairs, and partial meniscectomy were performed in 71.0%, 16.8%, and 12.2% of the knees, respectively. The ratio of women to men and the patient age were higher in the pullout-repair group than the meniscal-repair group. The Preoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscale (as an index of daily living activities) was significantly lower in the pullout-repair group than the meniscus-repair group. However, no significant differences were observed in these scores among the two groups postoperatively. Our results suggest that familiarity with the diagnosis and treatment of MMPRTs is necessary for orthopedic surgeons to manage isolated MM injuries.

Time-Dependent Increase in Medial Meniscus Extrusion Predicts the Need for Meniscal Repair in Patients with Partial Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Case-Control Study.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare medial meniscus extrusion (MME) in patients with partial medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conducted at two-time points and to determine whether patient characteristics or MME measurements differ in patients who respond to nonoperative treatment compared with those who require surgical treatment. Methods: Thirty-seven patients with partial MMPRTs underwent two MRI scans during nonoperative management or before pull-out repair. Among these, 17 patients received nonoperative management, and 20 underwent pull-out repair. Partial MMPRTs were diagnosed based on the MRI findings. MME measurements were performed on both MRI scans. Statistical and receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses were performed. Results: The duration between the two MRI scans was significantly shorter in the pull-out repair group than in the nonoperative management group. The increase in MME (ΔMME) on MRI scans was significantly greater in the pull-out repair group than in the nonoperative management group. Linear regression analysis revealed a weak correlation between the MRI interval and ΔMME in the nonoperative management group and a moderate correlation in the pull-out repair group. In the ROC construction, the cut-off value for ΔMME that requires surgical intervention was 0.41 mm, with a sensitivity and specificity of 85.0% and 52.9%, respectively. Conclusion: Patients with partial MMPRTs requiring surgical treatment had greater MME progression in a shorter time and a time-dependent increase in MME. Therefore, a ΔMME of ≥ 0.41 mm may be useful in deciding surgical intervention based on MRI retests. Level of evidence: III.

Epidemiological features of acute medial meniscus posterior root tears.

PURPOSE: Untreated or overlooked medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) induce sequential knee joint degradation. We evaluated epidemiological features of acute MMPRT for its early detection and accurate diagnosis. METHODS: Among 330 MMPRT patients from 2018 to 2020, those who underwent arthroscopic pullout repairs were enrolled. Patients who underwent non-operative treatment or knee arthroplasty, those with a cruciate ligament-deficient knee or advanced osteoarthritis of the knee, and those with insufficient data were excluded. Finally, we retrospectively evaluated data from 234 MMPRTs (female: 79.9%, complete tears: 92.7%, mean age: 65 years). Welch's t-test and Chi-squared test were used for pairwise comparisons. Spearman's rank correlation analysis was performed between age at surgery and body mass index (BMI). Multivariable logistic regression analysis with stepwise backward elimination was applied to the values as risk factors for painful popping events. RESULTS: In both sexes, there were significant differences in height, weight, and BMI. In all patients, there was a significant negative correlation between BMI and age (ρ = - 0.36, p < 0.001). The BMI cutoff value of 27.7 kg/m2 had a 79.2% sensitivity and a 76.9% specificity for detecting MMPRT patients aged < 50 years. A painful popping event was confirmed in 187 knees (79.9%), and the frequency was significantly reduced in partial tears as compared to complete tears (odds ratio: 0.080, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Higher BMI was associated with a significantly younger age of MMPRT onset. Partial MMPRTs had a low frequency of painful popping events (43.8%).

Accuracy of the newly developed Zimmer Biomet Root Aiming guide in tibial tunnel creation compared with that of conventional guides.

Background/objective: Accurate tibial tunnel creation is crucial for successful transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tears (MMPRTs). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the newly developed Zimmer Biomet Root Aiming (ZeBRA) guide for transtibial pullout repair of MMPRTs. Methods: This study included 50 patients who underwent transtibial pullout repair using the Unicorn Meniscal Root (UMR) (n = 25) and ZeBRA (n = 25) guides. The expected anatomic centre (AC) and tibial tunnel centre (TC) were assessed using three-dimensional postoperative computed tomography (CT) images. The expected AC was defined as the centre of the circle tangent to the triangular footprint of the MM posterior root. The expected AC and TC on the tibial surface were assessed using the percentage-based posterolateral location on the tibial surface. The absolute distance between the AC and TC (mm) was evaluated. Results: The mean AC location was 76.1% ± 3.1% posterior and 40.8% ± 2.1% lateral, whereas the mean TC location was 76.7% ± 5.3% posterior and 37.2% ± 3.6% lateral using the UMR guide and 75.8% ± 3.1% posterior and 36.5% ± 2.4% lateral using the ZeBRA guide. No significant difference was observed in the absolute distance between the UMR and ZeBRA guides (3.9 ± 1.4 and 3.8 ± 1.3 mm, respectively; p = 0.617). Conclusions: The newly developed ZeBRA guide allows accurate tibial tunnel creation, and its accuracy is comparable to that of the conventional UMR guide. Tibial tunnels were created at optimal positions using both guides, and the choice of the guide would depend on the surgeon's preference.

Meniscus extrusion is a predisposing factor for determining arthroscopic treatments in partial medial meniscus posterior root tears.

BACKGROUND: Patients with partial medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) sometimes require arthroscopic pullout repair because of their intolerable/repeated knee pains and continuous disturbance in gait during activities of daily living. However, the predisposing factors for future knee surgery in patients with partial MMPRTs remain unclear. We compared the findings of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between patients who underwent pullout repair and nonoperative management following partial MMPRTs. METHODS: Twenty-five patients who required arthroscopic repair for partial MMPRTs and 23 patients who were managed nonoperatively were evaluated during a mean follow-up period of 27.1 months. Sex, age, height, body weight, body mass index, duration from onset to initial MRI, MRI findings, and medial meniscus (MM) extrusion were compared between the two groups. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the correlation between MM extrusion and duration from onset to MRI examination. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the pullout repair and nonoperative management groups in terms of patient demographics and the positive ratio of MRI-based root tear signs. However, absolute MM extrusion in the pullout repair group (3.49 ± 0.82 mm) was larger than that in the nonoperative management group (2.48 ± 0.60 mm, P < 0.001). Extrusion of the MM (> 3 mm) was detected more frequently in the pullout repair group than in the nonoperative management group (P < 0.001). The odds ratio in the pullout repair and MM extrusion > 3 mm cases was 9.662. Linear regression analysis revealed a fair correlation between the duration from onset to MRI and MM extrusion only in the pullout repair group (0.462 mm/month increase in MM extrusion). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that more severe MM extrusions were observed in the pullout repair group than in the nonoperative management group. Major extrusion (> 3 mm) was also observed more in the pullout repair group than in the nonoperative group. Assessing MM extrusion and its severity can help determine a valid treatment for patients with partial MMPRTs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Retrospective comparative study.

Effectivity of the Outside-In Pie-Crusting Technique and an All-Inside Meniscal Repair Device in the Repair of Ramp Lesions.

Ramp lesions are characteristic medial meniscus injuries seen in anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries combined with ramp lesions increase the amount of anterior tibial translation and tibial external rotation. Therefore, the diagnosis and treatment of ramp lesions have received increasing attention. However, ramp lesions can be difficult to diagnose on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Additionally, ramp lesions are difficult to observe and treat intraoperatively in the posteromedial compartment. Although good results have been reported with the use of a suture hook through the posteromedial portal in the treatment of ramp lesions, the complexity and difficulty of the technique are further problems. The outside-in pie-crusting technique is a simple procedure that can enlarge the medial compartment and facilitate the observation and repair of ramp lesions. After this technique, ramp lesions can be properly sutured, using an all-inside meniscal repair device, without damaging the surrounding cartilage. A combination of the outside-in pie-crusting technique and an all-inside meniscal repair device (with only anterior portals) is effective in the repair of ramp lesions. This Technical Note aims to report in detail the flow of a series of techniques, including our diagnostic and therapeutic methods.

Medial joint space narrowing progresses after pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear.

PURPOSE: The extent to which arthropathic changes progress after medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) repair remains controversial. This retrospective study assessed medial joint space (MJS) narrowing progression after pullout repair for MMPRT and identified the correlating factors. METHODS: We included 56 patients who underwent pullout repair for MMPRT. The MJS of the bilateral knees was assessed with radiography using the fixed-flexion view. A second-look arthroscopy was performed one year post-operatively for all patients. The baseline characteristics, clinical scores, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade, and medial meniscus extrusion (MME) were identified. Statistical comparisons and correlation analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The MJS narrowing width was significantly larger in MMPRT knees than in contralateral knees (0.51 ± 0.85 mm vs. 0.09 ± 0.49 mm, p < 0.001). KL grade progression was observed in 23.2% (13/56) of patients. There was a significant difference between pre- and post-operative MME values, indicating MME progression (p < 0.001). Each clinical score showed significant improvement one year post-operatively (p < 0.001). Positive correlations were found between MJS narrowing and pre-operative MJS (coefficient = 0.510, p < 0.001), rate of change in MJS (coefficient = 0.929, p < 0.001), and increase in MME (ΔMME) (coefficient = 0.506, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Knees that underwent pullout repair for MMPRT showed progression of MJS narrowing by 0.51 mm at one year post-operatively, although clinical scores markedly improved. Correlating factors for MJS narrowing were pre-operative MJS, rate of change in MJS, and ΔMME. Preventing MME progression is essential for preventing arthropathic changes.

The stability of repaired meniscal root can affect postoperative cartilage status following medial meniscus posterior root repair.

BACKGROUND: Transtibial pullout repair yields beneficial clinical outcomes in patients with medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tear. However, the relationship between repaired meniscal root healing status and postoperative clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate changes in articular cartilage damage and clinical scores after pullout repair using two simple stitches (TSS). METHODS: Thirty-three patients who underwent pullout repair using TSS were assessed. Healing status was assessed by a semi-quantitative second-look arthroscopic scoring system comprising three evaluation criteria (width of bridging tissues, stability of the repaired root, and synovial coverage), 1 year postoperatively. MM medial extrusion (MMME) and cartilage damage were assessed preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The medial compartment was divided into 8 zones (A-H) for comparison of preoperative and 1-year postoperative cartilage damage. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee scores, and visual analogue scale pain score. RESULTS: Although cartilage damage did not aggravate significantly in most medial compartment areas, MMME progressed at 1 year postoperatively. No statistical differences were observed in cartilage damage between the central-to-medial area of the medial femoral condyle and the medial tibial plateau area at 1 year postoperatively. Regarding semi-quantitative healing scores, the stability score was significantly correlated with the International Cartilage Repair Society grade at 1 year postoperatively. All 1-year and 2-year clinical scores significantly improved compared with the preoperative scores. CONCLUSION: Regarding TSS repair, stability of repaired meniscal root negatively correlated with cartilage damage in the medial compartment loading area. All 1-year and 2-year clinical scores significantly improved than those of the preoperative scores. Achieving MM stability is crucial for suppressing cartilage degeneration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV case series study.

Medial meniscus posterior root repair influences sagittal length and coronal inclination of the anterior cruciate ligament: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tears (PRTs) lead to abnormal kinematic changes in the knee and may induce pathological external rotation of the tibia during knee flexion. This study aimed to investigate changes in the length and inclination of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) after MM posterior root repair using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: This retrospective study included 44 patients who underwent MM posterior root repair between 2016 and 2019. Clinical outcomes were evaluated before and after surgery. MRI examinations were performed at 10°/90° of knee flexion preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. The ACL length, proximal angle, and distal angle were determined using the sagittal view. MM extrusion and ACL inclination angle were determined using the coronal view. RESULTS: Clinical outcomes significantly improved 1 year after surgery. The postoperative ACL length (29.7 ± 2.4 mm) and proximal angle (47.0 ± 7.4°) at 90° of knee flexion decreased relative to the preoperative values (31.5 ± 2.3 mm and 51.8 ± 8.7°, P < 0.01). The postoperative ACL inclination (64.9 ± 5.6°) at 10° of knee flexion decreased relative to the preoperative value (69.7 ± 5.6°, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Pathologically-stretched linear ACL at 90° of knee flexion and a steep ACL inclination at 10° of knee flexion could be reduced after MM posterior root repair. This suggests that pullout repair could restore MM function as a secondary stabilizer, thereby preventing meniscal and cartilage degeneration.

Arthroscopic Meniscal Healing following Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair: A Comparison between Two Suture Materials.

Recently, transtibial pullout repair of the medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tear (PRT) has become widely accepted and provides satisfactory clinical outcomes. Widening after cyclic loading or ultimate failure load using different suture materials and configurations has been studied. However, no study has compared the clinical outcomes using different suture materials. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes after performing MMPRT pullout repair using different suture materials. We hypothesized that better clinical outcomes would be achieved using ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) tape compared with a normal polyester suture. Thirty-seven patients who underwent MM posterior root repair between November 2019 and May 2020 were retrospectively investigated. Pullout repair was performed using a hollow no. 0 polyester suture (n = 14) and UHMWPE tape (n = 23). Clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively, using the Lysholm knee score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score. The meniscal healing status was assessed using an arthroscopic scoring system (range: 0-10). All clinical scores were improved significantly in both groups. However, significantly higher meniscal healing scores and decreased VAS pain scores were observed in the UHMWPE group (7.3 ± 0.9 and 7.7 ± 11.3, respectively) than in the polyester group (5.6 ± 2.1 and 18.4 ± 18.6, respectively; p < 0.01). Suture cut-out and loss of the root continuity were observed in some cases (three cases [21.4%] in the polyester suture group and one case [4.3%] in the UHMWPE tape group). Both suture materials led to satisfactory clinical outcomes at 1 year postoperatively, whereas the UHMWPE tape was useful for obtaining good meniscal healing and decreasing the VAS pain score.

The clinical and radiographic outcomes of type 2 medial meniscus posterior root tears following transtibial pullout repair.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of different subtypes of type 2 medial meniscus posterior root tears following transtibial pullout repair. METHODS: In total, 147 patients (mean age: 66.2 ± 8.3 years) who were diagnosed with type 2 medial meniscus posterior root tears and underwent transtibial pullout repair were included. Patients were divided into 2A (n = 31), 2B (n = 90), and 2C (n = 26) groups according to tear type. Clinical outcomes were assessed pre-operatively and at second-look arthroscopy using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. The meniscal healing status was evaluated at second-look arthroscopy. Medial meniscus extrusion was calculated using magnetic resonance imaging pre-operatively and at second-look arthroscopy. RESULTS: No significant differences in pre-operative or post-operative clinical scores were observed between each subtype, although clinical scores improved post-operatively for each subtype. Significant differences were noted in the anteroposterior width of the bridging tissues at second-look arthroscopy (2A, 7.1 ± 1.2; 2B, 6.2 ± 1.7; and 2C, 6.2 ± 1.7 mm; p = 0.045); type 2A tears were the widest. There was a significant difference in post-operative medial meniscus extrusion (2A, 3.2 ± 0.9; 2B, 4.0 ± 1.2; and 2C, 4.0 ± 1.4 mm; p = 0.004) and its progression (2A, 0.7 ± 0.6; 2B, 1.2 ± 0.8; and 2C, 1.2 ± 0.8 mm; p = 0.008), and type 2A tears were the shortest. CONCLUSION: Although there was no significant difference in the post-operative clinical scores among different type 2 tears in the short term, type 2A tears showed better healing and medial meniscus extrusion progression prevention, thus indicating the usefulness of classifying tear type in estimating post-operative outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Concomitant posterior anchoring further reduces posterior meniscal extrusion during pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Transtibial pullout repair improves the clinical outcomes of medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tears (PRTs); however, reducing MM extrusion remains challenging. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the role of additional posterior anchoring (PA) during pullout repair in reducing the severity of MM extrusion compared to pullout repair alone. METHODS: Patients who underwent pullout repair with two-cinch stitches (TCS) only or TCS combined with PA (TCS-PA)-deployment of an additional suture anchor in the posteromedial corner of MM-were included retrospectively. MM medial and posterior extrusion (MMME and MMPE), MM extrusion and remaining volume (MMEV and MMRV), and corresponding ratios were evaluated pre-operatively and three months post-operatively using a three-dimensional meniscal model at 10° and 90° of knee flexion and compared within and between groups. RESULTS: A total of 15 and 16 patients treated with TCS and TCS-PA, respectively, were enrolled. At 90° knee flexion, both techniques significantly reduced MMPE (TCS: 4.2 ± 0.7 mm to 3.5 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.05; TCS-PA: 3.7 ± 0.8 mm to 2.8 ± 0.7 mm, p < 0.05) at three months post-operatively. TCS-PA reduced MMPE more significantly than TCS alone (p < 0.05). Only TCS-PA significantly improved the MMEV and MMRV ratios (39.6 ± 8.9% to 28.1 ± 6.0%, p < 0.05 and 60.4 ± 8.9% to 71.9 ± 6.0%, p < 0.05, respectively). Significance was not found in all other comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques improved MMPE at knee flexion at the three month follow-up, with TCS-PA providing significantly superior results. Our findings support the evidence that the application of PA may be an effective surgical option for alleviating persistent MMPE.

Clinical evaluation of suture materials for transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear.

BACKGROUND: There are no recommendations for specific suture materials in transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears using ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene sutures and suture tape. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 36 patients (27 women and 9 men, mean age 64.1 years) who had undergone transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears between November 2018 and December 2019. Two groups of 18 patients each received either two different cord-like sutures or suture tape. Clinical parameters were assessed preoperatively and on second-look arthroscopy (mean postoperative period 12 months). The meniscal healing status was assessed using a previously published scoring system (ranging from 0 to 10), and the incidence rate of suture cut-out was assessed on second-look arthroscopy. RESULTS: All clinical scores significantly improved in both groups, with no significant between-group differences on second-look arthroscopy. The arthroscopic meniscal healing scores significantly differed between sutures (mean 6.7 points) and suture tape (mean 7.4 points; p = 0.044). No significant between-group difference in the suture cut-out rate was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no significant differences in the clinical outcomes between ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene sutures and suture tape. Favorable clinical outcomes were obtained using both types of suture; however, the usefulness of suture tape appears to be limited.

Transtibial Pullout Repair of Lateral Meniscus Posterior Root Tear with Tissue Loss: A Case with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Medial Meniscus Tear.

Lateral meniscus (LM) posterior root tear (LMPRT) is mainly caused by trauma, especially trauma associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Although a transtibial pullout repair or a side-to-side repair is commonly performed for LMPRT, to the best of our knowledge, there is no clinical report of LMPRT with tissue loss using the pullout technique. Thus, the purpose of this report was to describe a clinical, radiographic, and arthroscopic outcome after pullout repair for a case of LMPRT with a large defect with a chronic ACL tear and complex medial meniscus (MM) tears. A 31-year-old man complained of knee pain and restricted range of motion after twisting his knee when he stepped on an iron pipe. The patient had a football-related injury to his right knee 14 years before presentation, and since then, the patient's knee has given out more than 10 times but was left unassessed. Magnetic resonance imaging showed LMPRT with tissue loss, ACL tears, and complex MM tears. Transtibial pullout repair of the LMPRT with ACL reconstruction and MM repairs were performed. Following the pullout repair of the LMPRT, an approximately 6 mm gap remained between the LM posterior root and root insertion. However, magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy at 1 year postoperatively revealed meniscal healing, gap filling with some regeneration tissue, of the LM posterior root. Furthermore, the lateral meniscus extrusion in the coronal plane improved from 3.1 mm (preoperative) to 1.6 mm (1 year postoperatively). Transtibial pullout repair with the remaining gap could be a viable treatment option for LMPRT with tissue loss, combined with ACL reconstruction.

Clinical outcomes of medial meniscus posterior root repair: A midterm follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) cannot prevent the progression of knee osteoarthritis. Conversions of knee arthroplasties are occasionally required following MMPRT repair. However, other knee-related surgical treatments following MMPRT repair are unclear. This study was aimed at investigating the midterm clinical outcomes and knee-related surgical events following MMPRT repair. METHODS: Patients with MMPRT underwent pullout repair using FasT-Fix modified Mason-Allen (F-MMA) suturing with an all-inside meniscal repair device. Thirty-two patients with follow-up duration >2 years were enrolled. We assessed the clinical outcomes and postoperative surgical treatment of both knees. RESULTS: F-MMA pullout repair improved all clinical evaluation scores in patients with MMPRT at a mean follow-up of 36.1 months. Postoperative arthroscopic debridement was required for one patient. An additional MMPRT repair was performed in one patient on second-look arthroscopy. None of the patients required ipsilateral knee arthroplasty. In the contralateral knees, one pullout repair of a newly developed MMPRT and two knee arthroplasties were performed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that F-MMA pullout repair yielded satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, subsequent knee-related surgeries were observed in 6.3% of the pullout-repaired knees and 9.4% of the contralateral knees. Our results suggest that surgeons should be aware of the worsening and/or occurrence of contralateral knee joint disease, even when the postoperative clinical outcomes are satisfactory following MMPRT repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Increased cleft width during knee flexion is useful for the diagnosis of medial meniscus posterior root tears.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate changes in the cleft width, defined as the distance between the lateral edge of the medial tibial plateau and that of the medial meniscus (MM) posterior root, using open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with MM posterior root tear (MMPRT). METHODS: This study included 25 patients (20 women and 5 men; mean age: 65.2 years) who were diagnosed with MMPRT and underwent pullout repair. Upon coronal imaging, the cleft width was evaluated at the 10° and 90° flexed knee positions. The difference in the cleft width (defined as the cleft width at 90° minus the cleft width at 10°) was also calculated. Upon sagittal imaging, the MM posterior extrusion (MMPE) at 90° was also evaluated. Separate univariate linear regression models were used to determine the association between the time from injury to MRI and radiographic measurements. RESULTS: The mean cleft width at 10° and 90° was 4.9 ± 2.6 mm and 7.4 ± 3.7 mm, respectively; the mean difference in cleft width was 2.5 ± 1.5 mm, and the mean MMPE at 90° was 3.7 ± 1.3 mm. There was a significant difference in cleft width at 10° and 90° (p < 0.001). The time from injury to MRI was significantly associated with the cleft width at 10° (R = 0.42; p = 0.023), cleft width at 90° (R = 0.59; p = 0.002), the difference in the cleft width (R = 0.62; p = 0.008), and MMPE at 90° (R = 0.53; p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the cleft width is significantly larger during knee flexion than during knee extension. Increased cleft width during knee flexion ("graben" sign) may help diagnose MMPRT, especially in cases where the cleft sign is unclear during knee extension. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

A posterior anchoring method decreases pullout suture translation of the medial meniscus posterior root repair during knee flexion.

BACKGROUND: The medial meniscus (MM) translates posteriorly and extrudes severely from the medial tibial plateau (MTP) during knee flexion in the MM posterior root tear (PRT) knee. Transtibial pullout repair of the MMPRT has been performed to regulate MM extrusion. This study aimed to evaluate pullout suture translation during knee flexion before and after posterior anchoring during pullout repair. We hypothesized that suture translation after posterior anchoring would be significantly decreased relative to that before posterior anchoring. METHODS: Thirty-five patients who underwent MM posterior root repair were prospectively investigated. Pullout repair was performed using two cinch sutures (outer and inner sutures) and posterior anchoring through the MM posterior horn and an additional bone tunnel on the MTP. The translation of the outer suture from 0° to 90° of knee flexion was measured and compared before and after posterior anchoring intraoperatively. The MM morphologic features were measured using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, and the correlation between these values and outer suture translation was evaluated. RESULTS: The average outer suture translation after posterior anchoring (1.6 ± 1.5 mm) was significantly decreased relative to that before posterior anchoring (2.5 ± 1.7 mm, P < 0.01). No significant correlations were observed between the MM morphological features and outer suture translation. CONCLUSIONS: The posterior anchoring method with an MM posterior root repair is useful in decreasing posterior translation of the pullout suture during knee flexion, which might have an advantage in preventing suture pullout from the repaired MM, leading to good clinical outcomes.

Large flexion contracture angle predicts tight extension gap during navigational posterior stabilized-type total knee arthroplasty with the pre-cut technique: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the predictors of tight extension gap (EG) compared with the flexion gap (FG) during navigational posterior stabilized-type total knee arthroplasty using the pre-cut technique. METHODS: Nineteen patients with tight EG (defined as FG-EG ≥2 mm after pre-cut; group T) and 84 patients with an approximately equal gap (defined as FG-EG = 0-1 mm after pre-cut; group E) were enrolled. Medial tibial slope angle, hip knee ankle angle, flexion contracture angle, and active maximum flexion angle were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The multivariate logistic regression model indicated that the probability of tight EG increased with flexion contracture angle (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.20; P ≤ 0.001). According to the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the flexion contracture angle cut-off value associated with tight EG was 15.0° (sensitivity, 85%; specificity, 78%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that a large flexion contracture angle (cut-off 15.0°) was associated with tight EG after pre-cut osteotomy during posterior stabilized-type total knee arthroplasty. Awareness of this risk factor may help improve preoperative predictability of tight EGs and preparedness for additional procedures, such as soft tissue release or capsulotomy, to correct them. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Postoperative external tibial rotation is correlated with inferior meniscal healing following pullout repair of a medial meniscus posterior root tear.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of tibial rotation on the postoperative healing status of the medial meniscus (MM) following pullout repair of the MM posterior root tear (MMPRT). METHODS: Ninety-one patients (68 women and 23 men; mean age 63.3 ± 8.8 years) who had undergone transtibial pullout repair of MMPRT were enrolled in the study. The tibial external rotation angle (ERA) in each patient was measured postoperatively using computed tomography in the extended knee position. The meniscal healing status following transtibial pullout repair was assessed by second-look arthroscopy (mean postoperative period 12 months) using a previously published scoring system (range 0-10). The association between the ERA and the meniscal healing score was investigated using univariate linear regression models. The ERA cut-off for improved meniscal healing score (≥ 7) was determined using receiver-operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: The ERA and the meniscal healing score were significantly associated, confirming that increased ERAs were correlated with worse meniscal healing status (R = - 0.28; P < 0.001). The optimum ERA cut-off value was 0.5°, with a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 63%. The mean meniscal healing scores were 7.3 and 6.2 among patients with ERAs < 0.5° and those with ERAs ≥ 0.5°, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the ERA was significantly correlated with the postoperative meniscal healing status. Postoperative tibial rotation could be one of the factors affecting postoperative outcomes of pullout repair of MMPRT. Controlling the tibial rotation may possibly improve meniscal healing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

A newly-developed guide can create tibial tunnel at an optimal position during medial meniscus posterior root repairs.

BACKGROUND: During transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tears (MMPRTs), accurate tibial tunnel creation within the anatomic MM posterior root attachment seems critical. This study aimed to evaluate the tibial tunnel position created by a newly-developed Precision guide during pullout repair of MMPRTs. METHODS: In 40 patients who underwent transtibial pullout repairs, the tibial tunnel was created using the Unicorn Meniscal Root (UMR) (n = 20) or Precision guide (n = 20). Three-dimensional computed tomography images of the tibial surface were evaluated postoperatively, using Tsukada's measurement method. The expected anatomic center of the MM posterior root attachment was defined as the center of three tangential lines corresponding to anatomic bony landmarks. The expected anatomic center (AC) and the tibial tunnel center (TC) were evaluated using the percentage-based posterolateral location on the tibial surface. The difference in the mediolateral and anteroposterior percentage distance between the AC and TC was calculated, as was the absolute distance between the AC and TC. RESULTS: The mean AC was located 77.4% posterior and 40.1% lateral. The mean TC was similar in the UMR and Precision guide groups. There was no significant difference in the mediolateral percentage distance (UMR 3.9% vs. Precision 3.6%, p = 0.405), but a significant difference was observed in the anteroposterior percentage distance (UMR 3.5% vs. Precision 2.6%, p = 0.031). The mean absolute distance between the AC and TC was 3.9 mm and 3.5 mm (UMR and Precision guide groups, respectively) (p = 0.364). CONCLUSIONS: The new Precision guide can create tibial tunnel in an optimal and stable position during pullout repair of MMPRTs.